A family of three lives at a remote farm in the wilderness, along with a farmhand. Following a piercing noise, the mute farmhand and all the wild and domesticated animals begin to attack the humans. The family begins to suspect the noise wasn't an airplane... and could quite possibly be something from another world.
MY THOUGHTS
As a lover of so bad they're good sci-fi and horror cheese from the 1950's... I can definitely say The Beast With 1,000,000 Eyes is flat out horrible.... and not in a good way.
I wonder if Alfred Hitchcock possibly saw this film and it inspired him to make a nature-gone-mad film properly a few years later. What separated his The Birds from the rest of the flock of horror films... was that it never explained why the fowl attacked. Any explanation would be ridiculous. That's all too evident here. An alien lands and has the ability to 'see through the eyes' of lesser beings and control them. Why? I don't know. If the (two-eyed) alien explained why he did this during the film's climax... my brain had already atrophied and I missed it. His explanation of that would raise the ridiculousness to new heights.
'Beast' is a very low budget affair with a brief run-time, cheap special effects (even for the time) and less than stellar performances. It's the sort of film that should have ended up on Mystery Science Theater 3000. But the films that aired on MST3K were more-often-than-not fun to watch. Beast With 1,000,000 Eyes is not.
Rob (Ezra Miller) is an unhappy loner at a prep school. He joins an extracurricular video club and one of his assignments is to get video of the school's hallways. While doing so, he captures the overdose deaths of popular twin girls. He then gets assigned to make a video to memorialize the beloved girls.
MY THOUGHTS
A unique look at the life of the modern teen.
Despite it's uniqueness, Aftershool in many ways is reminiscent of Gus Van Sant's 2003 film Elephant. The film's use of uncomfortably overlong shots convey the authentic unease of the high school years matches the earlier film. The natural performances filled with many dialogue-free passages and dark subject matter also ape Elephant. Despite the similarities, the two films are very different beasts.
One thing Elephant was lacking was one central performance to unify it together. Ezra Miller shines with his sensitive and complex portrayal of Rob. He perfectly captures the angst and alienation of the teen years without cliche.
The only thing Rob can connect to is YouTube-type videos. The film makes a definite and valid comment how the internet (from porn to violent videos) is disconnecting us all from communicating directly with each other.
Afterschool could easily be called 'boring' or 'dull' by the average film-goer. Its style may be oft-putting for some, but its realism makes for a compelling film. Thankfully, we still have filmmakers who try to make something against the norm.
A washed-up boxer (Jamie Smith) sees a woman (Irene Kane) being abused and tries to stop her attacker. He gets to know her and falls in love. Her attacker is her employer/boyfriend (Frank Silvera) and tries to have the boxer killed. Instead, his goons kill the boxer's manager. Now the boxer is wanted for his boss' murder... and his girl has disappeared.
MY THOUGHTS
Stanley Kubrick's second film definitely shows the promise of his immense talents. Not only does he direct, but he wrote the screenplay, shot the film, edited it, and co-produced it. It's a B-movie both by budget and run-time... but far exceeds your average production.
Stanley Kubrick had already done a short film on boxing called Day Of The Fight, so he was well versed in the subject for a launching point for the film:
The boxing scenes in Killer's Kiss show this, but they are only a small part of the overall film.
The low budget limits the acting quality and the film's short run-time limit the character development. These keep the film from developing truly great and interesting characters. The awesome camerawork and location shooting makes up for these shortcomings a bit. The camerawork evokes the best of film noir and Kubrick was able to light these actual locations to great stylish effect. The climactic chase scene is the highlight of the film.
The film is not in the same league with Kubrick's later work, but is still an interesting piece of film history.
1956 - Toho
Directed by Ishiro Honda
(American dubbed version)
SYNOPSIS
Nuclear tests near Japan unleash several giant caterpillars that terrorize a small mining town. A giant egg in discovered in one of the mines cracks, releasing a massive pterodactyl named Rodan who eats the catepillars like a snack and soon he and his mate threaten the entire country!
MY THOUGHTS
An entertaining Godzilla retread.
Like many of the Godzilla (or most disaster films) series, we're made to watch uninteresting humans that we never really care about and how they react to the crisis at hand.... all while we wish for more monster action.
Rodan also follows the formulaic plot of the 'man in monster suit' genre known as Kaiju --- 'monster emerges, threatens people, people strike back, monster strikes back harder, someone comes up with a successful plot to stop monster.' It's done no better or worse than any other. But starting the film off with another villain, the caterpillars, was a bit of a departure from the norm. Still, it just delayed Rodan's entry into the film.
Rodan is serious in tone, like the first two Godzilla films that proceeded it. This film lacks the original Gojira's anti-war and anti-nuclear message and chooses to not make any political statement at all. By the time Rodan and Godzilla would meet, in 1964's Ghidorah, The Three-Headed Monster, the characters would be played for humor. The later films are 'more fun' but these early films are still cool. This was the first Kaiju film by Toho in color.
The miniature models that get trampled and destroyed by Rodan are some of the best I've ever seen. Recreating a small town, instead of Tokyo, seems to look 100 times more authentic. The miniatures are still superior to those in the 1990's and early 2000's Godzilla films.
The voice dubbing was better than the average Godzilla film as well and used actual Asian-American actors like Keye Luke and a young George Takei. This is great considering there's some Godzilla films where I've heard Japanese characters speak with thick New York accents!
Rodan could have used more Rodan, but otherwise is still an entertaining film for fans of Kaiju.
Former New York drug dealer Priest (Ron O'Neal) is now living the high life in Italy. His only cares are his girl (Sheila Frazier) his drug habit and his weekly poker game. Priest learns of an oppressive government in a small African nation and is convinced to help the helpless citizens. While helping smuggle in arms for the people, he is captured by the government.
MY THOUGHTS
As a fan of the blaxploitation genre, I found the original Super Fly (despite its AMAZING soundtrack) to be a very lackluster film. Super Fly T.N.T. is worse.
The Priest character is an anti-hero... yet anti-heroes possess some admirable traits. Priest does not. He's a pusher and junky working for the mob with a bad attitude. In the sequel, he does NOTHING with his time before being called into service.
TNT is remarkably similar to the second Shaft sequel Shaft In Africa, released the same year. Both feature their titular character being thrust into action in Africa. While Shaft In Africa is a passable action film, Super Fly T.N.T. is horrible.
The film was directed by star, Ron O'Neal and shot in Italy and Africa, yet you would never know it. When you have the opportunity to film on-location you can show off your surroundings, it adds so much to the film's realism. O'Neal doesn't do this at all. It could have been shot on a studio back lot for the same effect he goes for here. At many points, the film is so dark, you cannot see what is going on. This is especially evident when Priest is captured and is planning his escape in his cell. O'Neal is a very sub-par director and would only helm one other film.
Alex Haley wrote the screenplay. The author of Roots is more than a competent writer, so its a wonder how this script was such a muddled mess. The beginning of the film contains some finely written scenes like Priest and his girl going to dinner with Robert Guillaume and his date. The dialogue seems like real life and the film briefly comes alive. Once the scene is over, Guillaume's character and his date disappear from the rest of the film. This and the establishing poker match add little to the plot. The pivotal character of Dr. Sonko (Roscoe Lee Browne) is introduced early on, but we don't find out what he's all about until Priest does... 30 minutes into the film.
That first half hour is completely lacking any action or drama... or even a point. Apart from the dinner scene, it drags on at a snail's pace.
The middle of the film also lacks little action or drama until Priest is captured and tortured.
The film ends abruptly. Priest escapes capture and makes it back to Italy. We never find out if Priest's sacrifices helped at all. Did the weapons made it to the people? If they did, did the weapons help at all to overthrow the government?
Plus, Priest entered the African nation without a passport, yet was able to fly back on an airline. He might have received help from Sonko... but who knows.
I wonder if the filmmakers ran out of money and didn't film a chunk of the screenplay, resulting in this crap fest.
Super Fly T.N.T. is probably best remembered by being name-dropped in Pulp Fiction. Samuel L. Jackson's Jules proclaims "Every time my fingers touch brain I'm Super Fly T.N.T., I'm the Guns Of The Navarone." Why would he insult himself like that?
A rocket arrives to rescue the survivors of the doomed first mission to Mars. No one believes the sole survivor, Carruthers (Marshall Thompson,) that his 9 crew mates were killed by a monster. He is to be shipped back to Earth to stand trial for their murder. One crew member after another disappears and they are forced to believe the monster is real and aboard their ship!
MY THOUGHTS
A very entertaining and (at times) tense thriller
'It' plays disturbingly similar to Ridley Scott's Alien, just without the overwhelming claustrophobic atmosphere (or positive female roles.) The film does have some genuine tension which is rare for a 50's monster film.
The film is also reminiscent of the 1951 version of The Thing, just set in space. The human characters are all scientists battling an alien creature. The actors portraying them are uniformly wooden in both movies. The bland acting didn't hurt The Thing and it doesn't hurt It. Also coincidentally, the monsters were both played by cowboys. James Arness played The Thing and here Ray "Crash" Corrigan is It.
The monster suit could pass for a less cool-looking relative of the Creature From The Black Lagoon. Thankfully, the director wisely kept the creature in the shadows for most of the film. 'It' is certainly more menacing and creepy that way.
The script was able to keep create an intelligent film that is not hindered by its low budget. The action essentially takes place on only two sets. (Each level of the ship is merely the same set redressed.)
Despite the smart screenplay, there are a few glaring science errors that probably went over the heads of a 1950's audience that really stick out today.
It's noted the monster breathes oxygen... so what was it doing on oxygen-free Mars?
You're in a fragile space ship, so why are you firing guns and setting off grenades? The ship must have a good ventilation system to soak up all the explosive and cigarette smoke to keep the crew from dying of smoke inhalation. These are only the tip of the iceberg...
So if you just kick up your feet and turn off your brain you will certainly enjoy this classic monster flick.
Posts
